- United States Information Agency [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons
- The pay-me plan would have stopped King’s protest.
For example, the Trump Team wants to snuff out your constitutional right to free speech and assembly by closing 80 percent of the White House sidewalk (leaving a just a 5-foot-wide sliver), adding limits on spontaneous demonstrations, and putting an exorbitant fee on public protests in our nation’s capital city. In other words, you’d still be “free” to rally for or against any issue or policy — but not for free. Apparently meant to deter any more of the mass demonstrations against their policies on women, immigrant children, climate change, etc., they want each protesting group to pay hundreds of thousands of dollars to the government for policing and other necessary costs of guaranteeing the public’s right to protest.
Corporations and billionaires would have no problem paying, but regular grassroots groups would be priced off the public lawn. Such historic protests as Martin Luther King Jr.’s 1963 march and his “I have a dream” speech couldn’t have happened under Trump’s pay-me plan.
I’m guessing that a good 90 percent of Americans — Republican, Democrat and otherwise — would shout “NO!” to this repression of a fundamental civic right. But I’d also bet that not a single congressional candidate in the recent midterm elections even mentioned it to voters. Yet, in perverse Orwellian newspeak, the Trumpsters pushing the plan say it’s “designed to provide greater clarity about how and where demonstrations can occur in a manner that protects historically important land.”
I was born at night, but it wasn’t last night! This proposal is designed to protect nothing but the bad policies of the power elites from objections by riffraff like you and me.
You can contact Hightower at jimhightower.com.